Talk:Megalomys luciae
Requested move edit
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was page moved. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 23:00, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Saint Lucia Giant Rice-rat → Megalomys luciae — This species is mainly known under its scientific name, Megalomys luciae, not under any of the various common names that authors have devised for it--"Santa Lucian Pilorie", "Santa Lucian Giant Rice Rat", "St Lucy Giant Rice-rat", "Saint Lucian Musk Rat", and probably more. See WT:MAMMAL#Common names for a fuller discussion of why I prefer to use scientific names for animals such as this. Ucucha 16:15, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support — so many uncommon vernacular names, so much confusion. --Una Smith (talk) 04:59, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose No evidence here, merely declamation and (quite literally) WP:ILIKEIT. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 06:06, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- 746 "Saint Lucia Giant Rice-rat"
- 4,620 "Megalomys luciae"
- See WP:Search engines; raw Google is not to trusted, and any argument which depends solely on it is flawed. Ideally, search results should be linked to, so they can be examined, but one likely flaw is obvious: Linnaean names are the same in every language, as they are designed to be; if 90% of the hits on Megalomys are not English, it is not even plurality English usage. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 19:15, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- The Google search can be limited to English language pages, in which case there are 3,680 English hits on "Megalomys luciae". In any case, I prefer Google Books and Google Scholar. On Google Books in English there are 75 hits on "Megalomys luciae" and 4 on "Saint Lucia Giant Rice-rat". Remember, this is an extinct species that was already rare when it was first described by scientists, from an island in the eastern Caribbean. In English it has no authentic vernacular name, and its scientific name is without question its most common name. The key word here is "authentic"; made-up names in academic publications are neologisms, and distinctly are neither common names nor vernacular names. --Una Smith (talk) 20:06, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Megalomys luciae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140627094911/http://www.iucnredlist.org/ to http://www.iucnredlist.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:57, 21 July 2016 (UTC)