Talk:Megalograptus/GA1
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Simongraham in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 01:33, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Comments edit
- Add a short description to the top of the article with the template {{short description}}.
- Done. Ichthyovenator (talk) 08:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- Consider adding ALT to images (this is not a GA criteria but is good practice per MOS:ALT).
- Done. Ichthyovenator (talk) 08:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- "The two most distinctive features of Megalograptus was its massive and spined forward-facing appendages, far larger than similar structures in other eurypterids, and its telson (final body segment), which was surrounded by unique "cercal blades", capable of grasping. " – should be "were" as the features are plural.
- Fixed. Ichthyovenator (talk) 08:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- "Megalograptus are known from what was once near-shore marine " – consider rewording.
- Reworded and made more concise. Ichthyovenator (talk) 08:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- "unsually" – typo.
- Fixed. Ichthyovenator (talk) 08:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- "The appendages of Megalograptus, about 3.5 times the length of the carapace were significantly larger than those of Mixopterus" – add comma after "carapace".
- Done. Ichthyovenator (talk) 08:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- "Megalograptus was the structure formed by the telson and the immediate preceding segment (the pretelson)." – I believe should be the adverb "immediately".
- Yes, fixed. Ichthyovenator (talk) 08:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- "On thecarapace, they were flat and disc-like and scattered without any obvious pattern" – Add space between "the carapace".
- Fixed. Ichthyovenator (talk) 08:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Ichthyovenator: Excellent work. This article is now ready to review. simongraham (talk) 19:03, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- Fixed. Ichthyovenator (talk) 08:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Assessment edit
- Comprehension: The comprehension is good. Undetermined
- Verifiability: The article is verifiable. Pass
- Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive. Pass
- Neutrality: The article is neutral. Pass
- Stability: The article is stable. Pass
- Illustration: The article is well illustrated. Pass
- Overall: Pass/fail. Pass
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (prose) | The prose is generally clear, concise and understandable. | Pass |
(b) (MoS) | The article is compliant with the manual of style. | Pass |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (major aspects) | The article broadly covers all major aspects. | Pass |
(b) (focused) | The article is focused without unnecessary deviations. | Pass |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
The article is compliant with the policy on neutral point of view. | Pass |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
No ongoing content disputes or edit wars present. | Pass |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
Congratulations, Ichthyovenator. The article meets the criteria to be a Good Article. | Pass |
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.