Talk:Media portrayals of Indigenous Australians

This article was nominated for deletion on January 6, 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Popular culture, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Popular cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Popular cultureTemplate:WikiProject Popular culturePopular culture articles

Australia: Indigenous peoples Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Media portrayals of Indigenous Australians is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Opinion piece

Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This article makes no attempt whatsoever to present a balanced view of its subject and is written in a manner to advance a particular position rather than a neutral encyclopedia article. I have some sympathy with the position this article takes, but it is not an encyclopedia article. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 21:53, 23 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

You are welcome to add more contrary research if there is any but basically every study I found when I was researching this said exactly the same thing--that portrayals are negative and/or stereotyped. Calliopejen1 (talk) 08:33, 25 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Given a Royal Commission and a federal government inquiry made recommendations to improve Media portrayals of Indigenous Australians, I don't quite see why the article fails to meet NPOV. Have recent edits improved it to the extent the tag can be removed? Although there are guidelines encompassing positive portrayal and providing balanced ... I don't see anybody reporting that this is a great Australian success story. --Matilda ^talk 05:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Media portrayals of Indigenous Australians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070913122339/https://www.uow.edu.au/crearts/sjcw/APME/APME_Issue6/Bullimore.html to http://uow.edu.au./crearts/sjcw/APME/APME_Issue6/Bullimore.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:57, 22 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic