Talk:Medbury School

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Assessment edit

Marking as Stub / Low. Needs expansion and more sources, with perhaps a few pictures. Camaron1 | Chris 10:29, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Although I have been involved in editing, I have changed the class to Start due to a big re-write. Camaron | Chris (talk) 12:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

History section edit

The "History" section seems to be copied almost exactly from the school's history page. That page is referenced, but shouldn't that section be rewritten some? The page is also much better than when I recommended that it be deleted. -- Imperator3733 17:58, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Further improvements edit

I have made further improvements to the article. I have re-worded the history section to avoid copyright issues, and added more referenced information. I have also created an alumni section with one person and reference. Given the history and status of the school - I am sure there are more alumni, they just need finding. Camaron1 | Chris 18:30, 15 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Medbury School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:10, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply