Talk:Medallions (book)

Sourcing

This article allegedly does not cite its references or sources. What kind of a source do you need to describe a book other than the book itself?

There is the other problem how precize was the writer. Recently the story about Prof. Spanner has been confirmed by a state institute in Poland. Xx236 14:57, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

This article should be thoroughly expanded, quoting literary criticism, contribution to Holocaust research, memes etc.

Also her Prof Spanner's story accuses Germans of producing soap out of people, which was a persistent "urban myth", if I may use this phrase in this horrific context. Zezen (talk) 15:49, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Medallions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060901171332/http://nupress.northwestern.edu/title.cfm?ISBN=0-8101-1743-6 to http://nupress.northwestern.edu/title.cfm?ISBN=0-8101-1743-6

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:42, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 30 October 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. per discussion consensus, no WP:PTOPIC (closed by non-admin page mover) — Shibbolethink ^{(♔ ♕)} 00:51, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

---

Medallions → Medallions (book) – No primary topic, the book has 183 views but Medallion (architecture) has 197, The Medallions has 134 and Medal has 3,945[[1]]. Redirect back to Medallion (disambiguation) per WP:DABCOMBINE. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:42, 30 October 2022 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). – robertsky (talk) 23:18, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

• There had been a series of moves which results in Medallions -> (book) -> Medallions. ([2], [3]) over a long time. Maybe RM can establish the necessary consensus for the request to stick. – robertsky (talk) 23:04, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

  There was 1 in 2005 and a move back in 2015 I'd hardly say that makes it controversial but if you think it should be discussed that's OK. Crouch, Swale (talk) 23:12, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

• Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 23:57, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
• Support per nominator. No clear primary topic for this plural noun — so the safest bet is to redirect "Medallions" to the dab page "Medallion (disambiguation)". Paintspot Infez (talk) 15:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
• Support per nom. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:11, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
• Support - common sense tells us this book is not the primary topic. ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 18:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.