Talk:Measurements of neutrino speed

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 37.14.137.115 in topic Missing lower bounds?

Missing lower bounds? edit

In Measurements of neutrino speed#Fermilab (1970s) and Measurements of neutrino speed#Supernova 1987A, upper bounds are provided on v but not lower bounds. I think that this is probably a mistake. Perhaps you meant to put an absolute value sign around the deviation from c, like so

 

Right? JRSpriggs (talk) 19:52, 22 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yes. I will correct it to
 
as in the MINOS paper arXiv:0706.0437. --D.H (talk) 08:43, 23 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

this is a great article, except it is not a great article for wikipedia; it is a crappy article cause it is not for a general audience what is wrong with you scientists, are you to arrogant to write in a manner that an avg college educated person can understand ? Please, put in the intro somehting simple like "best current estimates put the velocity of neutrinos at x miles/sec, which is x% of the speed of light (186 mps) x mps is equivalent to y feet per second, or going from NY to LA x times a secodn "

ok arrogant scientists ????? and if you think i'm being rude, this is a general encyclopedia; you deserve far worse then i'm giving you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.195.10.169 (talk) 17:14, 4 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your comment has no sense and is written in an offensive way 37.14.137.115 (talk) 13:41, 7 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Overview - neutrino mass edit

The sentence originally said that neutrinos are 'massive', which might make a less knowledgeable reader think the particles are heavy compared to other subatomic ones. The revision rewrites the end of the sentence to clarify that.MeDrewNotYou (talk) 22:14, 25 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Measurements of neutrino speed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:16, 7 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Measurements of neutrino speed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:54, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply