Talk:Mean Everything to Nothing
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Fezmar9 in topic Merger proposal
 | Fourteen Years of Excellence was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 27 April 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Mean Everything to Nothing. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mean Everything to Nothing article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Merger proposal
editThis is a limited edition EP that won't have much information or notability, and the article will doubtfully be expanded beyond a stub class. Fezmar9 (talk) 06:41, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
It has a lot of notability between the fans of Manchester Orchestra, it is a sepreate release from the album and I do not know think it should be merged. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TMS2787 (talk • contribs) 07:32, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- It maybe a notable release to fans, but not notable enough to hold up its own wiki page. Please read WP:NALBUMS. The article will more or less be copied and pasted into Mean Everything to Nothing. Fezmar9 (talk) 17:56, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- What exactly is the merger proposal? ƒingersonRoids 18:51, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, the merge templates were removed before the discussion had really begun. I was proposing that the limited edition Fourteen Years of Excellence EP be merged here. The release is not notable enough to have its own article, and this is the most relevant page to merge it with. Fezmar9 (talk) 18:59, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Why is not notable enough? It is a pretty notable release for Record Store Day as they are an emerging act and once they get bigger new fans are going to want to know and shouild know about it. Just because you don't think it is "notable" does not mean it's not notable, because it def is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TMS2787 (talk • contribs) 08:17, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- "Emerging"? That's another word for WP:UPANDCOMING. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:57, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that the articles should probably be merged. Considering it's of such limited release, it's not even really a full-blown EP release. It does in fact come with the full length album, and you can't get it any other way. I second the proposal. WtfitsRICK (talk) 15:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- No, it does not come with the full length. It comes by it self at select indie stores a FEW days before the album officialy comes out. It is seem as compaion to it because it using similar cover art and has a different version of the tracks. It is NOT coming with the album. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TMS2787 (talk • contribs) 20:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Direct from the band's website: http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l297/vectorm/MO/ManchesterRDS.jpg WtfitsRICK (talk) 21:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- It does not come with the album, the album is not a 2-disc collection. It is a stand alone EP that comes in a seprate slip case, has it's own cover art and is released a few days before in select indie shops around the country. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TMS2787 (talk • contribs) 14:57, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Direct from the band's website: http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l297/vectorm/MO/ManchesterRDS.jpg WtfitsRICK (talk) 21:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- No, it does not come with the full length. It comes by it self at select indie stores a FEW days before the album officialy comes out. It is seem as compaion to it because it using similar cover art and has a different version of the tracks. It is NOT coming with the album. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TMS2787 (talk • contribs) 20:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that the articles should probably be merged. Considering it's of such limited release, it's not even really a full-blown EP release. It does in fact come with the full length album, and you can't get it any other way. I second the proposal. WtfitsRICK (talk) 15:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- "Emerging"? That's another word for WP:UPANDCOMING. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:57, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Why is not notable enough? It is a pretty notable release for Record Store Day as they are an emerging act and once they get bigger new fans are going to want to know and shouild know about it. Just because you don't think it is "notable" does not mean it's not notable, because it def is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TMS2787 (talk • contribs) 08:17, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, the merge templates were removed before the discussion had really begun. I was proposing that the limited edition Fourteen Years of Excellence EP be merged here. The release is not notable enough to have its own article, and this is the most relevant page to merge it with. Fezmar9 (talk) 18:59, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- What exactly is the merger proposal? ƒingersonRoids 18:51, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- The album is a freebie when Mean Everything to Nothing is purchased at select independent music stores for Record Store Day. Regardless of how the EP is obtained, it still fails wikipedia notability guidelines. Any sources on the EP do not state more than a release date and track listing and maybe display the cover art. Fezmar9 (talk) 18:18, 17 April 2009 (UTC)