This redirect is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I removed two misleading claims from this section that were not supported by the attached citations. MeWe’s terms of service do not include what the article called a poison pill clause (which incidentally is not actually a thing in this context). And, other social media sites (including Facebook) are unable to change their terms of service without notice to users (usually with various exceptions) so that MeWe would not be unusual in this regard anyway. Second, there was no source for the claim that “many other” sites “claim ownership of user-generated content” (the claim was not in the cited article). Facebook for instance does not do this, though the claim is a little vague and so arguable. I removed the entire sentence because in context it would clearly imply that MeWe was special in this regard even without the "unlike many other" sites bit. I'm not sure Wikipedia should have a section on the Terms of Service, since it gets into the interpretation of legal documents (which neither Wikipedia nor the journalists it tends to cite are qualified to do). 142.127.170.203 (talk) 15:55, 4 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=icon}
