 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lack of neutrality edit
I am surprised by the amount of bias in this article. The fact that it is rectangular points to it being (like many NZ grounds) a dual purpose one. The main grandstands are along the sides (preferred for rugby, whereas the best view of cricket is often considered to be from the ends). I will return and tidy when I get the chance. dramatic (talk) 00:54, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV edit
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
- There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
- It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
- In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:07, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Proper cricket ground edit
What's a proper cricket ground? Hack (talk) 04:34, 27 October 2013 (UTC)