Talk:McAlpine v Bercow

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Damages edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copied from the main SB article's Talk page. Basically, I suspect the damages are £15k, although of course the legal costs push up what she's having to cough up into the unpleasant category:

Not sure why Lord McAlpine would allow her to accept the £15k offer that was made back in January, before she forced him to drag her to court, but it's looking a little like he might have. The Express quotes his solicitor talking as if the offer has been accepted by both sides,[1] but then goes on to contradict itself the following day by saying she's facing £50k damages.[2] The Independent mentions £15k and also talks of some of the £100k legal bill being offset by insurance.[3]Bromley86 (talk) 13:46, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic