Talk:Max Rubin

Opening comment

I'll refrain from further edits on the Rubin article. I don't want to launch a flame-style quarrel here, and I do not contribute to Wikipedia enough to understand the subtleties of what's acceptable and what isn't it. My corrections were removed because they containted "POV", evidently. But the article itself is pure POV and drawn entirely from Rubin's own promotional materials. The article does not appear to belong on Wikipedia at all. Rubin says he is a casino consultant. He further advertises his bona fides in the advantage gambling world. He claims never to share the secrets he learns from advantage gamblers with casinos, with the exception of one casino. This is an unusual, fragile and dubious position. It seems strange to me that Wikipedia promotes such a controversial position. It is not very encyclopedia-like. Articles like the Rubin article subvert the value of this website.

You didn't include any citations for the additions that you made. Your changes also all seemed to be an effort to discredit Rubin. The article as written now seems to be comprised of factual statements. Rubin is a gambling expert and author (first sentence.) The short description of his book Comp City is accurate. (I've read it.) The words "sought after" in that one sentence seems promotional, and I'll delete that after I finish typing this. He did serve as a commentator on those shows, and the membership information regarding the Blackjack Hall of Fame and his hosting of the Blackjack Ball are both also factual. The 2nd paragraph is possibly problematic. I'll revise it, and you feel free to share your opinion here.

Your fears of launching a flame-style quarrel are unfounded. Most of us are able to conduct a civil discussion of edits and articles. :) Rray 16:09, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Very nicely handled. I sort of do want to discredit Rubin, frankly, but I know in my heart that Wikipedia is not the place. Thanks for stripping the biased material from the article -- including my own. The speed and integrity with which you've handled it are impressive and speak to the overall success of the Wikipedia project.

That's very kind of you to say. If I missed anything that should be added or deleted, feel free to let me know or even change it yourself. :) Rray 00:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Max Rubin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120625072536/http://alfrancesco.com/max_rubin.html to http://alfrancesco.com/max_rubin.html/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:01, 22 January 2018 (UTC)