This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I find it strange that anyone would question the importance of an eminent scholar of this level. In addition, it seems to me ridiculous, in a sense, having to waste time to prove something that is obvious. For these reasons, I hope User talk:Fenix down (or somebody else ) has the foresight and courtesy to restore as soon as possible the page so that I can continue to contribute to build it. Thanks Fpittui (talk) 20:37, 20 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
