Talk:Maus/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Tea with toast in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk · contribs) 20:51, 4 July 2012 (UTC)Reply


I look forward to reviewing this article. I would like to alert contributing editors that checklinks found a broken link in the article. Please address this in the meantime while I complete the review. Thanks! --Tea with toast (話) 20:51, 4 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for taking the time to do this. I've fixed the broken link issue by finding another source—the source I was using seems to have vanished from Google's memory... CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 21:28, 4 July 2012 (UTC)Reply


Final Review

edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    --Excellent job with all the sources. I appreciate the citation style you have used.
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    --Great job bringing in images from other related topics to help dress the article up.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    --This is an impressive and well crafted article. I can see that I lot of hard work went into detailing the background information and sources. I can't think of much that is left to do to improve the article. Great job! --Tea with toast (話) 23:56, 4 July 2012 (UTC)Reply