External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mauro Moretti. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:52, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed update of the information regarding the trial against Moretti for the Viareggio train derailment edit

Hi everyone, I noticed that the information regarding the trial against Moretti for the Viareggio train derailment is not up to date at the latest degrees of judgement.

Here below, in yellow I have drafted a sentence with all information missing that could be integrated into the article. Furthermore, I have added two sources to back it up.

Do you think it can be a viable option to update the article? Thank you in advance for your kind support. --Claudia Frattini (talk) 09:24, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed update

On 30 January 2017, Moretti was convicted by an Italian court for his alleged role in a train crash in 2009, in which a freight train carrying liquefied gas derailed and caught fire at the Italian town of Viareggio, killing 32 people. Moretti received a seven-year jail sentence, but several levels of appeal may take years to resolve the conviction during which time Moretti will be free. Despite initial support from the company in retaining Moretti in his role during this legal process[1] he was shortly removed from the position of CEO.[2]

With sentence pronounced on January 8, 2021, the Supreme Court annulled the sentence issued by the Court of Appeal on 20 June 2019, deferring his position to a new appeal judgment.[3][4]

References

  1. ^ Leonardo CEO Backed by Board After Rail Crash Conviction, Tom Kington, DefenseNews.com, 2017-01-31
  2. ^ https://www.defensenews.com/breaking-news/2017/03/18/leonardo-ceo-moretti-out-replaced-by-italian-banking-exec/
  3. ^ "Viareggio manslaughter convictions quashed". Retrieved 3 September 2021.
  4. ^ "Strage Viareggio: cade l'aggravante dell'incidente sul lavoro, prescritti gli omicidi colposi" (in Italian). Retrieved 3 September 2021.
  Partly done: Reworded for clarity. WhinyTheYounger (WtY)(talk, contribs) 21:19, 11 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
@WhinyTheYounger: Thank you very much for your help!
The text as written, however, could give rise to the misunderstanding that the annulment is a consequence of the statue of limitation for the manslaughter conviction. Actually, the convictions were annulled because the Court of Cassation deemed it necessary for the defendants to undergo a new judgment to assess responsibility, as a proper assessment of the defendants' guilt had not previously been made. To this end, I would propose to slightly revise the text as proposed below (I've highlighted changes in yellow). What do you think? --Claudia Frattini (talk) 13:08, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
In January 2021, the Supreme Court of Cassation overturned Moretti's conviction as declaring the statute of limitations for a manslaughter conviction had expired. The case was remanded and deferring his position to the appeals court of Florence for a new judgement on his responsibilities.