Talk:Maurice Moynihan

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

If you disagree with this text, please make your comments below (Tim Griffin 19:56, 15 February 2007 (UTC))Reply

I disagree with the text which is not NPOV. The article should open saying that he was a civil servant and may have asessments and evaluation of his worthiness or contribution (as it does) under Honours and tributes. - Kittybrewster 22:11, 15 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
I have addressed your concerns and taken your advice. The sources for this article, including official documents, archive summaries, and media reports, are all in the public domain, and the article reflects a consistency of recognition in public of Maurice G. Moynihan's contributions.Tim Griffin 09:36, 16 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

"Renowned" is a peacock term it would be best to avoid in the lead section. Stating his attainments should do the job adequately. Tyrenius 20:56, 16 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Indeed if he were not renowned, he would not be notable. - Kittybrewster 22:08, 16 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Keen eye: thanks for the further edits. Tim Griffin 02:13, 17 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maurice Moynihan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:33, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply