This article was nominated for deletion on 2 November 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
trim down embellished parts and remove family treeedit
Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.
Information is not fully accurate. much of it is embellished and long winded and unnecessary. Many functions were only temporary and no longer hold those positons. it can be easily misconstrued. family members names should be taken out to protect them. it should be edited to be back where it was in 2010. its too personal and the family wants it out.
the first paragraph does a fine job of summarizing whats important. 109i40194124 (talk) 09:39, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Note: I have removed non-notable family (childrens) names. Eagleash (talk) 10:12, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
I am marking this edit request as answered, but it can be reopened if issues arise again. Altamel (talk) 02:31, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
This article consisted of almost 100% unsourced BLP claims, with a lot of puffery included. A number of those BLP claims have clearly been contested (see article history and WP:UTRS), so I have removed all unsourced content from the article. Please do not reinstate any of it without providing reliable sources. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:25, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
For a bit more detail, UTRS #30297 contains a legal threat (which is why I declined it). But in accordance with WP:DOLT, we should not host content that is claimed to be false and damaging if it is totally unsourced (or, in fact, not solidly supported by reliable sources). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:32, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
