This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was created or improved during the Celebrating Women Scientists edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in 2016. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Maureen A. Donnelly is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion
Have put in for a speedy deletion request per G5. HappyValleyEditor, am removing request deletion tag as speedy per G5 better applies. -- WV ● ✉✓ 00:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
I've declined the request as notability is clear and the sourcing adequate. Our practice is that deleting a G5 is not necessary if an established editor takes responsibility, which I am doing. DGG ( talk ) 01:27, 12 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
DGG, Softlavender, what makes this prof notable--- the publicaitons list? I can find basically nothing in Google books, Google news and regular search. My nomination of this article was not in bad faith-- it was because I could not find regular sources to establish notability. @Winkelvi:HappyValleyEditor (talk) 02:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
HVE, it's obvious you are targeting Fouette's articles. That's very bad form. Especially for a PROD, because it would have been automatically deleted after a week if not removed. Move on, stay away from Fouette's articles. Softlavender (talk) 02:24, 12 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
I had a serious quesiton about why this person qualifies for notability. You can answer and help me understand, or not, but save the accusations for someone else. So, is it the publications list, going by WP:Acdemic? Which point of WP: ACADEMIC? You are noth more expereinced than I am and you both think she is notable, so I have a good faith question as to why. Knowing the answer will give me better skills at assessing articles. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 02:40, 12 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
