Talk:Matthew Sutcliffe

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Devon Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity: Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The statements about his chop-logic and abuses of Roman Catholic clergy sound like they were written by Roman Catholic clergy.

Maybe using the phraseology "invective argumentation" is more appropriate than surmising the merits of his arguments with which the biographer conveniently and scornfully disagreed with Sutcliffe on. Catholic apologists argued as polemicists with as much invective as the Protestant Matthew Sutcliffe.

The comment is referenced. It is better to find a second reference that contains a different opinion. If such criticisms of Sutcliffe are in reliable sources, they can appear in the article. Charles Matthews (talk) 07:47, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic