Talk:Matthew Segal
Latest comment: 6 years ago by 193.105.24.61 in topic is this encyclopedic?
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Untitled edit
What else is needed to prove notability? What can be changed to improve the tone? --Emilywww (talk) 19:01, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
is this encyclopedic? edit
This entire article reads like a promotional material for this man. Somebody should rewrite in a neutral tone, because this man is not a universally loved saint. 193.105.24.61 (talk) 08:45, 27 March 2018 (UTC)