Advertising of free music at mattgoss.biz

edit

What are peoples opinions on recent edits putting adverts to free music on this article? They were removed once but have been put back in again. The artists website is listed in the links section and I feel that inline advertising of free music is inappropriate content for this article.

Since these lines were put back in to the article, I felt this may need discussion Ginga (talk) 15:13, 10 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Try and contact Wikipedia, if they see it fit, then they will take it down or ask someone to take it down. - Reggie Reepolar (talk) 06:59, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Matt Goss. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:09, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Looks like two official websites

edit

Something is weird here. Mattgossofficial removed the ".co" and changed the link in the infobox to http://www.mattgoss.uk. But that takes me to https://mattgoss.la/. There is however still a website https://mattgoss.co.uk/ (with the ".co") that looks similar and has information about the most recent single and the upcoming album. I am going to restore the original url until someone can explain what is going on and we can reach consensus on which website is the official. And if it is the .la one, the url in the infobox should point directly to it. Sjö (talk) 05:57, 21 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps there are two official websites, aimed at different regions. Or maybe one is a fake. @Mattgossofficial: would you like to comment? Sjö (talk) 07:39, 22 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nope. Although on the surface that's what they'd like you to believe. I looked into this closer as something was amiss. the .la website is the fake (or rather unofficial fan site). The Twitter link from that site takes you to an unofficial profile, as does the Facebook link, the Instagram link etc. That said, I'm blocking the Wikipedia account as passing off as somebody they're not. -- Longhair\talk 08:37, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Just noticed, the .la website footer states "This site is not affiliated with Matt Goss....". -- Longhair\talk 08:53, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply