Talk:Match Group

Latest comment: 1 year ago by HussainHx in topic Narrative style

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it a publicly traded company with significant business operations, and a market capitalization of over $3 billion. Stockst (talk) 17:06, 26 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Redundancy with Match.com

edit

I wanted to note that the Match.com article currently includes a lot of content about brands owned and acquired by Match Group, which would be much more appropriate for this page. Proposing migrating much of that content to this page and keeping Match.com's focus primarily on that service.Balle010 (talk) 19:30, 8 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

New CEO effective March 1

edit

From a company press release dated January 28, 2020[1]:

DALLAS, Jan. 28, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- Match Group (NASDAQ: MTCH) today announced that after 14 years, Mandy Ginsberg will be leaving the company and stepping down from the Board of Directors. Ms. Ginsberg will be handing the reigns to her longtime deputy, Shar Dubey, who currently serves as the President of Match Group. Ms. Dubey will assume her role effective March 1.

davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:04, 29 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Edit Request

edit

Hi FeldBum Thanks again for your help on Shar Dubey’s page.

Here are the edits for Match Group:

In April 2019, Match Group announced a restructuring of its leadership team, appointing three new general managers in Asia to help accelerate international growth in Japan, Taiwan, India, South Korea and other parts of Southeast Asia, where there are over 400 million singles. In August 2019, Match Group announced a majority investment in Muslim dating service, Harmonica. Match Group has also tailored its existing products, such as OkCupid, to better serve international markets and its cultural norms and behaviors. This includes creating a unique subset of questions for users to fill out that touch on the moral, ethical, political and social issues that speak to each specific culture. This localization strategy has proved successful in multiple countries such as India, where they have seen a significant spike in downloads.

Thank you again for all your help!!

LeannaTruong (talk) 20:26, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi LeannaTruong
That's a lot. Let me look through each one and get back to you.
Thanks!
--FeldBum (talk) 21:31, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hi again LeannaTruong
Most of these look good, but I'll need to make some changes. My notes.
  • 1-7 looks good. I'll make those as is
  • 8 (Safety Advisory Council) need to be rewritten, but the source is good. I'll change a bit
  • 9 also needs a rewrite. That's a long quote.
  • 10 too. That's very promotional
  • 11 Fortune.com is not a good source for Fortune 100. Do you have another source? I'll take a quick look
  • 12 is a little copy-pasted and little market-y, so I’ll edit
  • 14 needs a rewrite ("it" for companies, not "they") but sources are good
  • 16 is also very quote-heavy. See Wikipedia:Quotations
  • 17: again, not sure about these giant quotes. Maybe just “which Match Group disputed as cherry-picked and misrepresenting internal emails.” You're venturing into overuse of quotes
  • 18 needs a rewrite (“it” instead of “they,” some overly marketing-ish text, but I’m OK with it being a separate section, although maybe best as a sub section under History.
I'll start with the easy ones, then do the rewrites. Can you look for a source for Fortune 100?
--FeldBum (talk) 18:54, 25 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hi again LeannaTruong,
Done most of these. The long quotes still need to be rewritten (I added one in as I rewrote it), and I need a third-party citation for Thomas Gaissmaier and Fortune list.
I can take a stab at those rewrites, along with the internal section, and then I'll close this request.
--FeldBum (talk) 04:44, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Citation needed on the continued operations on Russia claims.

edit

Citation needed on the continued operations on Russia claims. 200.26.172.85 (talk) 16:20, 9 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Narrative style

edit

The history section in particular has plenty of excellent detail, but it reads as a timeline of disconnected events rather than as a narrative. HussainHx (talk) 03:38, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply