Talk:Master Liquidity Enhancement Conduit
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Untitled edit
- As the reviewing admin., I say to put in some references from major newspapers, and it should be enough. Probably the article could take some additional expansion on the basis of the material you will find there. But see also WP:COI and WP:BFAQ.
And follow up with developments. DGG (talk) 04:08, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
To say "Mark To Model" is similar to the Enron fraud is quite an extraordinary claim to make. I would expect to see some pretty substantial citations for it, and yet there are none given. If it can't be cited, it should be removed. Note: "Mark to model" is correct practise under US GAAP for illiquid securites. (See FASB 172, which I would link to here but it is under copyright and I can't find a free reference) Seanhunter 08:41, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Merged supersiv into this edit
There was a stub article called Super SIV which I have changed to a redirect to here and borrowed the links from. I also moved the sentance about when this was abandonned into here. QU4N71FY (talk) 09:51, 7 April 2008 (UTC)