Talk:Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Page move
editthe sources on this page and [1] refer to the case as "Commonwealth of Massachussetts..." Dont know why that was left out but ive gone ahead and moved it.
- Not to mention it must disambiguate between other such commonwealth's like VA.Lihaas (talk) 05:32, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Status
editI've used Gill-specific sources to document the status of this case. Hope that's ok. The 2 cases seemed joined at the hip at present. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 20:25, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120704043440/http://www.metroweekly.com/poliglot/2012/07/breaking-doj-asks-supreme-court-to-take-two-doma-c.html to http://www.metroweekly.com/poliglot/2012/07/breaking-doj-asks-supreme-court-to-take-two-doma-c.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:14, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100712061020/http://www.metroweekly.com/poliglot/2010/07/federal-court-rules-doma-viola.html to http://www.metroweekly.com/poliglot/2010/07/federal-court-rules-doma-viola.html
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.baywindows.com/index.php?ch=news&sc=glbt&sc2=news&sc3=&id=109272 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100825003640/http://www.glad.org/current/news-detail/judgment-entered-in-gill-doma-challenge/ to http://www.glad.org/current/news-detail/judgment-entered-in-gill-doma-challenge/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110117030414/http://www.metroweekly.com/poliglot/2011/01/doj-files-doma-defense-in-firs.html to http://metroweekly.com/poliglot/2011/01/doj-files-doma-defense-in-firs.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100714204138/http://www.glad.org/uploads/docs/cases/DOMA-FAQ.pdf to http://www.glad.org/uploads/docs/cases/DOMA-FAQ.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724135920/http://www.glad.org/uploads/docs/cases/gill-v-office-of-personnel-management/doj-letter-re-ma-doma-cases-02-2011.pdf to http://www.glad.org/uploads/docs/cases/gill-v-office-of-personnel-management/doj-letter-re-ma-doma-cases-02-2011.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120405041721/http://www.metroweekly.com/poliglot/2012/04/federal-appeals-judges-consider-whether-doma-is.html to http://www.metroweekly.com/poliglot/2012/04/federal-appeals-judges-consider-whether-doma-is.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)