Talk:Mass gap

Suggest merge

I suggest Mass gap and Yang–Mills existence and mass gap should be merged together. Reason: both articles are quite short, but Yang–Mills existence and mass gap actually contains more background information. Merging them together should be perfectly possible. 131.111.8.96 01:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

This is not a good idea, in my opinion, because mass gap is much more general than Yang Mills. The article is short because no one has done serious editing on it yet. Mass gap is a fundamental idea in quantum field theory, important for the decay at long distances of correlation functions, while "Yang Mills existence and mass gap" is a problem by some institute.Likebox 03:00, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

I agree with Likebox. The article defines the term "mass gap". Merging it with the mentioned article seems a bit arbitrary. --88.66.233.175 12:29, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm removing the merge. The mass gap is a basic property of all field theories, not just Yang-Mills. Akriasas (talk) 18:36, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Relation between mass gap and mass defect

Does the mass gap relate to a mass defect? I'm not intimately familiar with these concepts, but they seem related. Is mass defect the description of a mass gap within the context of nuclear binding? Is mass gap, therefore, a more general term? 75.139.254.117 (talk) 09:38, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

answering clarifications needed & other major & minor ambiguities

(& fighting a crazy spellchecker on a new device!)

I managed one page edit ok. The next one's got iffy-er: I'm trying to add a footnote

https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.4512v3 [MATH.DG] Witten p.11

For one of these questions (| modified Mar 2016) (more than a few, some extraneous & unnecessary). This would be for:

A quartic massless scalar field theory develops a mass gap already at classical level[clarification needed].

In the Examples from Classical Theories section. All The classical theories are decently described & delineated by the entire Witten publication cited below.

The Problem Of Gauge Theory Edward Witten (Submitted on 24 Dec 2008 (v1), last revised 3 Jan 2009 (this version, v3))

    This article is the written form of a lecture presented at the conference "Geometric Analysis: Past and Future" (Harvard University, August 27-September 1, 2008), in honor of the 60th birthday of S.-T. Yau. 

Subjects: Differential Geometry (math.DG); High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th); Quantum Algebra (math.QA) Cite as: arXiv:0812.4512 [math.DG]

 	(or arXiv:0812.4512v3 [math.DG] for this version)

Insult to injury I've lost my UN/PW apparently.

Off to wiki-editting (sic) remedial class....

• I agree merging pages would increase complexity.
• Classical mass gap is greater in scope than the Yang-Mills tower

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.26.221.126 (talk) 05:35, 9 September 2018 (UTC) 

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mass gap. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20060902110903/http://tosio.math.toronto.edu/wiki/index.php/Cubic_NLW/NLKG to http://tosio.math.toronto.edu/wiki/index.php/Cubic_NLW/NLKG

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:23, 21 January 2018 (UTC)