This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Event Venues, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Event VenuesWikipedia:WikiProject Event VenuesTemplate:WikiProject Event VenuesEvent Venues articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject College Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College BasketballWikipedia:WikiProject College BasketballTemplate:WikiProject College Basketballcollege basketball articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There's an edit war brewing over the image/logo in the top of the Infobox. With most of the stadium/arena pages I've seen, the Infobox contains either a graphic of the venue, or an image of the exterior. In either case, the image is reasonably small in dimensions, 200 pixels or so, give or take.
Someone using the IP of 184.162.110.70 has been trying to place a very large image of the interior of the arena. While I don't really mind if it's an interior or exterior image, or the graphic logo, it's the size of the image that bothers me. The dimensions are 480x640. That is huge, taking up too much space on the screen, for what is arguably no added value.
So before 184.162.110.70 tries to put this image back up, can he/she please explain the rationale for posting such a large image? Others, please weigh in with your opinion as well. Thanks, --MikeUMA (talk) 21:08, 20 January 2012 (UTC)Reply