This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please join the discussion and add your name to the list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.FreemasonryWikipedia:WikiProject FreemasonryTemplate:WikiProject FreemasonryFreemasonry articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Some masonic buildings were designed with a Masonic tenant in mind (ie there was a lodge room in the original floor plans)... in others the rooms were originally planned for other purposes, but then converted to Masonic use when the Masons moved in. Do we know which is the case here? Blueboar (talk) 01:49, 22 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
As the article says, Citrus lodge No. 118 moved out of the building back in the 1960s ... so technically, 301 Hendrix Ave (the lodge's current address) is "the Masonic Temple of Citrus Lodge No. 118". The building that is the subject of this article is more accurately the "Former Masonic Temple of Citrus Lodge No. 118"... I realize it is unlikely that we will ever have an article on the new building... so my concern isn't a disambiguation issue... but it would be nice to have an article title that is accurate. Perhaps one of the alternative names? Blueboar (talk) 19:55, 7 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
