Talk:Maryland Route 231/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Racepacket in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 13:17, 26 February 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
No disamb links and all links check out. Does the Benedict Bridge deserve its own article rather than being a redirect to this article?
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- Is the Governor Thomas Johnson Bridge in Solomons or Solomon's Island?
- The bridge is in the census-designated place of Solomons. VC 16:21, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- Is the Governor Thomas Johnson Bridge in Solomons or Solomon's Island?
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Need ref for "village of Benedict, which was the site of the landing of British troops to march toward Washington prior to the Battle of Bladensburg."
- I added a reference for the War of 1812 information. VC 16:21, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- Need ref for "village of Benedict, which was the site of the landing of British troops to march toward Washington prior to the Battle of Bladensburg."
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- The National Bridge Inventory gives the 2008 traffic density. Perhaps you should include it in the article.
- Why and how were tolls removed from the bridge?
- I added information about the tolls and traffic to the History. VC 16:21, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- B. Focused:
- Article would be more focused if the Benedict Bridge material were spun off into a separate article.
- I merged the Benedict Bridge article into this article for several reasons: the bridge is not significant enough to warrant its own article; the article was a stub that had little growth prospects; there is not a lot of information available about this bridge; and the bridge article contained much of the same information as the MD 231 article even before I updated MD 231: see pre-merger edition of Benedict Bridge. VC 16:21, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- Article would be more focused if the Benedict Bridge material were spun off into a separate article.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- This article represents significant work by its author. I am placing the review on hold for you to address concerns. Racepacket (talk) 15:17, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
Nominator gives a logical expanation for the merger of the bridge article with the Rt 231 article. Additional references check out. All other concerns have been resolved. Congratulations. Racepacket (talk) 18:15, 26 February 2011 (UTC)