Talk:Mary Jo White

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Bwrs in topic In popular culture


Will White Honsetly Regulate Wall Street edit

I don't know a ton about this but the last paragarph of the entry suggests in the first sentance that she may protect Wall Street, the second tries to follow that point but doesn't. It says:

For the past 10 years, she has been Chair of the litigation department at Debevoise & Plimpton. It has been asserted summarily in Rolling Stone magazine that, among other duties at Debevoise, White has used her influence and connections to protect certain Wall Street CEOs from prosecution. In this regard, The Huffington Post noted, "If she is confirmed by Congress, the agency will have at its helm a well-respected attorney who won high-profile cases against mobsters, terrorists and financial fraudsters over the course of nearly a decade as the U.S. attorney for Manhattan."

Interested in her wealth and connection to Wall Street CEOs? The NY Times reports on February 12:

S.E.C. Nominee Discloses Law Firm Wealth By PETER LATTMAN It is no secret that the partners at the white-shoe law firms Debevoise & Plimpton and Cravath, Swaine & Moore earn a decent living. The financial disclosure form of Mary Jo White, the Obama administration’s pick to become the next chairwoman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, reveals just how decent. Ms. White and her husband, John White, have a net worth of at least $16 million, according to the filing. Ms. White, 65, heads the litigation department at Debevoise; Mr. White, 65, is co-chairman of the corporate governance practice at Cravath. http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/02/11/mary-jo-white-discloses-law-firm-wealth/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.155.110.2 (talk) 15:11, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mary Jo White. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:40, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mary Jo White. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:30, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Audrey Strauss edit

Hey guys! So with Audrey Strauss as acting attorney, do you think we should change "She was the first and only woman to be the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York," to "She was the first woman to be the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York,"? Obviously, she is still the only female attorney for that district to be confirmed by the Senate.

Lemme know watcha think?

Cheers.

GreenFrogsGoRibbit (talk) 11:50, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

The fact that Strauss is only serving as "acting" might suggest White remains the sole woman to fully serve in this role. --ZimZalaBim talk 19:10, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
I'd go with "first and only Senate-confirmed." jhawkinson (talk) 00:04, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
I've made that change. --ZimZalaBim talk 00:11, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Awesome. Thanks guys! GreenFrogsGoRibbit (talk) 00:52, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Corrupt defender of corporate murderers edit

"This lady should be in jail for aiding and abetting the Sackler Family oxycontin murders." I believe we should add this statement to the main article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.58.188.103 (talk) 19:44, 15 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

In popular culture edit

"She was played by Suzan Perry in Mr. Robot, season 2, episode 2." I believe we should add this statement to the main article. Bwrs (talk) 03:34, 5 October 2021 (UTC)Reply