Talk:Mary Jane (Megadeth song)

Reviewed?

@Onel5969: Are you sure about reviewing this article without any concerns raised or tags added? I very much agree with Scope creep's previous decision to redirect and the concerns around the quality of citations. In fact after two reverted redirects i'd wonder if an afd should be considered to get some consensus. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:50, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the ping... was a misclick. Like you, I agree with Scope creep's concerns. Technically, it passes, NSONG, but that doesn't abrogate the need to also pass GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:53, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

I removed 8 of those reference that were non-rs and there wasn't much in the way of quality, left. Now they are back, which bothers me. scope_creep^Talk 15:19, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

I think given this has already been through afd (albeit 15 years ago), and with the lack of notability established, it needs another community discussion, so I have initiated a fresh afd to find a consensus-driven conclusion. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:03, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Only just noticed an afd not long after that ended keep. It matters little as both were many years ago so are largely irrelevant by today's standards. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:09, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

I feel it is worthy of an article. BoxxyBoy (talk) 03:39, 12 December 2022 (UTC)