| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... The text has been expressed in different words to what is found on the University website --Mogadorable (talk) 21:41, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
- The current version is okay from a copyright point of view. Thank you, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:44, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
@Joining the dots: Facebook is so well established as a non-reliable source that we have a shortcut specifically for it: WP:RSPFACEBOOK. And honestly it should never have really needed a discussion, as it doesn't come close to what Wikipedia defines as reliable because anyone just posts whatever they want on Facebook. Reliable sources need to have editorial review. -- Fyrael (talk) 14:53, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hi @Fyrael, 3 days after you made this warning another user, Curious critters put the image sourced from Facebook back into the article and marked the change as a minor edit. You had clearly warning about the use of Facebook in the edit history and here in Talk. They have ignored that and strangely used the minor edit tag for the additional of content that is clearly disputed. Ardenssedvirens (talk) 22:19, 4 April 2022 (UTC)