This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I have removed the {{prod}} tag which proposed that this article be deleted, because I think that this article has merit and so should not be deleted from Wikipedia. I'm leaving this message here as notification. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article as that process is only to be used when there is no opposition. Warden (talk) 10:04, 26 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
Many lists confirm the fact the four movies i mentioned are widely considered among the greatest films of all time, i quoted Entertainment Weekly,BBC Culture and the American Film Institute. The recent edits showed that i quoted perfectly the sources,and yet you editors still remove these informations,which are important. Since you blocked me, i just ask you to re-add my edits,as they are correct,reliable and pertinent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.32.186.109 (talk) 22:24, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Multiple editors have explained to you that your contributions to this article, and to many others, are barely legible and improperly cited. It is not the job of other editors to clean up after you just because you have decided certain information is absolutely necessary to the article. Your insistence on continuing to edit in this manner indicates an unwillingness to learn and that you are not here to make a contribution to the encyclopedia. Until you change your attitude and editing style, you will find yourself repeatedly reverted. ---The Old JacobiteThe '45 00:13, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
The things that The Old Jacobite said are spot-on. According to talk page guidelines, you should not delete other editor's comments without their permission. You are free to make a new edit request with new section. I strongly suggest refer this page → Wikipedia:Edit requests before you make one. regards, DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 04:17, 12 March 2017 (UTC).Reply
Hello TheOldJacobite: Thanks for the message. I noticed that IP's been removing the answered (declined) requests and keeps on making new requests. So, I had to revert to the old revision of this page by NotTheFakeJTP. regards, DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 04:26, 12 March 2017 (UTC).Reply
Yes, I saw the action you took and I agree with it. Thanks! ---The Old JacobiteThe '45 12:36, 12 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Please,i ask you to change the line "Most of the pair's films were in the crime genre." to "Most of the pair's films were in the crime genre. Some of their films are widely considered among the greatest films of all time." 79.35.185.53 (talk) 17:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. JTP (talk • contribs) 01:09, 11 March 2017 (UTC)