Talk:Martin King (businessman)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by SS49 in topic Requested move 15 April 2020
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move 15 April 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved (non-admin closure) ~SS49~ {talk} 14:50, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Martin King (Eminence) → Martin King (businessman) – Eminence folded in 2009 [1] but in any case "Eminence" is not a suitable disambiguator. (All this assumes the subject is notable, but that's another matter). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:00, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 17:13, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support, businessman is better than "Eminence" which is not neutral and defunct.--Twilight Tinker (talk) 18:19, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:33, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.