Talk:Martin Jetpack

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 122.61.209.125 in topic Glenn Martin

Aircraft type edit

I beleive the description of the Martin Jetpack as a personal helicopter is inappropriate for the follwing reasons:

 1. From the Wikipedia description of a Backpack helicopter the helicopter has a rotor with all the
associated structure and control system which the Martin Jetpack does not have. 2. The Martin Jetpack uses ducted fans for thrust along with vanes for vectoring the thrust.

The reference to a personal helicopter and a Backpack helicopter needs to be reconsidered for this article. Comments? Mac160 (talk) 00:38, 24 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'd have to agree; it's rather more a personal VTOL aircraft than a helicopter. - The Bushranger (talk) 20:34, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Additional flight expenses edit

Are the two guys who lift you into the air part of the purchase price? If so, can you pay extra to get taller guys to increase the maximum altitude?Romaniantruths (talk) 16:52, 4 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

The "two guys" are not necessary, as you can see from the video on Martin's website. 76.28.72.87 (talk) 18:30, 14 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

This is speculative, is it not edit

I've seen a video of this thing hovering (my assessment of what it was doing) and I've read a press release that implies it shot skyward (without pilot) and deployed a parachute. As far as I can make out this thing has yet to "fly" in any other sense, yet the article is written as though it's a viable proposition rather than a work in progress.

One particular phrase "...is cheaper to maintain and operate than other ultralight aircraft" - I'd be fascinated to know the basis for that! I know how much it costs to maintain a microlight from personal experience; I can't imagine anything this complex being cheap - and there are no working examples (correct me if I'm wrong) and therefore there can be no cost data available. - Fjleonhardt (talk) 11:52, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hovering counts as flying, however the article probably does need a good going-through. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:46, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Combat Radius is higher than Range edit

How it is possible? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.47.189.25 (talk) 08:24, 25 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Glenn Martin edit

Is it a coincidence that the designer of the Martin Jetpack, Glenn Martin, shares his name with Glenn L. Martin, the founder of Glenn L. Martin Company, builder of many aircrafts and rockets such as Titan IV and now a part of Lockheed Martin? --HelgeStenstrom (talk) 14:29, 5 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

It is probably a coincidence, but there has been no verifiable proof that the machine started development in the 1980's. All links and reporting simply repeat what the so-called inventor says. The craft strongly resembles the SoloTrek XFV, which flew 7 years earlier than the Martin Jetpack. The amount of disinformation around this thing is truly incredible and does not speak well of journalists or the people who promoted it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.61.209.125 (talk) 00:48, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Martin Jetpack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:31, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply