Talk:Martin J. Levitt

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 9 February 2012 by reviewer Nolelover (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

What is the source for his death? Cannot seem to locate an obituary. Thanks. [Anon]

POV - article seems to be very biased against the subject and tone of voice is very opinionated and unencylopeadic. Palnu (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:50, 27 April 2012 (UTC).Reply

I agree. There's a reason for it (see next section). Richard Myers (talk) 17:48, 11 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

revert to remove suspected sock puppet edits edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion

See: [1] Richard Myers (talk) 17:42, 11 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet Rcodella has been confirmed, and banned, based on evidence in other articles. However, in this article only one significant edit was removed. Will check for additional sockpuppet activity. Richard Myers (talk) 17:32, 12 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Curiously, this article appears to have been started by sockpuppet EcFitzsimmons, and also edited by confirmed sock puppet Rcodella. An investigation is in progress, here: [2] Richard Myers (talk) 00:06, 13 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

EcFitzsimmons and Rcodella, both of whom have edited on this article, have been confirmed by checkuser and blocked as sock puppets of Oppo212, after a history of repeated infractions of Wikipedia rules that has extended over four years. For more information, please see: [3]

Richard Myers (talk) 05:38, 15 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Article is not written in a neutral view edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I may try to come back and make some edits later, but for now I'll try to flag as biased. -KaJunl (talk) 03:01, 1 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit- looks like there is already a POV tag -KaJunl (talk) 03:03, 1 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

NPOV edit

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have made some significant edits for the purposes of NPOV. The earlier version of this article was almost comically biased (a "summary" section was essentially a roast of the subject). I have zero opinion on Levitt, but this level of bias is frankly extreme and contained no serious information (which I was careful not to delete). I'd add that some more work is necessary to bring this article up to snuff, but I do think it was ultimately an improvement. PaulRevered (talk) 05:06, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic