Education

edit

What about his education? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.232.190.175 (talk) 16:38, 26 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Martin Hägglund. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:12, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Dear All,

I have removed the internal link to the This Life wiki page under the This Life subsection. That wiki page is currently under notice (POV) and the link was misplaced (the first reference to the book should contain the hyperlink). Until the dispute is resolved, I think it makes sense to not have the internal link. Jts6489 (talk) 01:41, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of interest: could Jts6489 be Martin Hägglund himself?

edit

I have found much of Martin Hägglund’s writing stimulating and refreshing. Therefore, I am somewhat disappointed in finding out that this entry is probably written almost entirely by Hägglund himself. I first noticed that the Swedish entry to Martin Hägglund had been rewritten with over 59 contributions by the user Jts6489. That entry included numerous statements like Hägglund being ”regarded as the most important young philosopher in the USA” and a ”writer of the New York Times” (many of them have now been removed).

Then I noticed that Jts6489 had made 25 contributions here including exclusively positive reviews in External links and less encyclopaedic information about prizes and fellowships. Jts6489 also temporally removed the linking to This life until he (I am quite sure I know his gender) had removed the criticism and rewritten that entry with over 20 contributions. When I looked at the other contributions to this page, I saw that the most eager contributors had only written about Martin Hägglund and nothing else. These include:

128.84.215.166

Mugij

79.84.59.140

128.122.93.186

24.103.43.80

2601:400:8000:a552:2186:9f1d:ef81:e87b

193.10.144.72

112.141.181.36

Thomasschmidt113

I believe this case is even worse than for example Pete Buttigieg (see https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/12/pete-buttigieg-wikipedia-page-editor.amp) and a reminder of why we need to be more alert to COI editing if we want to avoid Wikipedia being used as an advertising space.--Inge Källgård (talk) 11:36, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply