Talk:Martin B-10

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 71.197.234.30 in topic English

Over-Info edit

I note a lot of information in the body of the article is redundant. In my opinion, this drags down the article quite a bit (the plane has two six-hundred hp engines that provide a top speed of 187mph and a cruising speed...). Could we eliminate a bit of this?--Ingoolemo 02:15, 2004 Aug 2 (UTC)

  Resolved

Extlinks in section headings edit

FWIW, putting external links in section headings is a little weird. For one thing, external links are better as reference material, thus their placement at the end. For another, we've been generally discouraging links of any sort in section headings, for aesthetic reasons mostly I think. A version of this article printed out might look kind of strange. Stan 04:50, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)

  Resolved

Assessment edit

This article could easily be a B-class with some inline citations and references other than external WebPages. --Colputt 13:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC)   DoneReply

Claims about "powered" gun turret edit

I've encountered a factoid on the Interwebs about this plane having the first aircraft powered turret. It's not true, and I actually have a citation to a fuller online discussion of the design, which I would cite if I had the time to learn how to do that right now. http://home.att.net/~jbaugher2/b10.html --Erik Lund —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.80.5.117 (talk) 19:42, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

IIRC the first bomber with a proper power-operated turret was the Boulton Paul Overstrand, although the Hawker Turret Demon may pre-date it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.31.130.20 (talk) 16:05, 4 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Chinese Martin B-10 raid over Japan edit

Chinese Martin B-10 bombers dropped leaflets over Japanese cities on May 19, 1938, to prove that the Chinese air force was capable of striking Japan.

http://books.google.com/books?id=s2NKutuUlA8C&pg=PA320#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=mpSkIrOCrQkC&pg=PA126#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=Re8pJnCXvWoC&pg=PA265#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=N6yy9mXwAEUC&pg=PA86#v=onepage&q&f=false

Rajmaan (talk) 00:56, 30 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

English edit

Hi guys, I don't edit anymore as all my previous attempts were removed. Under the "Legacy" heading, the second phrase starts like this:

" It was half again as fast as any biplane bomber, " Not english. My opinion, I'm a French Canadian, the word " again " is superfluous.

Thank you for maintaining these pages. Netweezurd (talk)

It would be better worded as " It was twice as fast as any biplane bomber"— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.31.130.20 (talk) 16:01, 4 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

While it seems clumsy, "half again" is legitimate English usage, if a bit dated. It's not the same as "twice as fast." And if you delete "again," it comes out as "half as fast," which is incorrect. It might be better stated as "50% faster," but I don't see any real problem with this wording. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.248.185.22 (talk) 17:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

To be clear, even though this discussion is three years old at this point, "half" means 50% but "half again" means 150%. The B-10 was much faster than other bombers, not much slower. 71.197.234.30 (talk) 15:41, 7 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Operational history needs expansion edit

Dear Wikipedians, I tagged for expansion the section about use of this aircraft, can help with Argentine use but don't have sources for other countries. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Regards, DPdH (talk) 23:34, 29 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Martin B-10. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Martin B-10. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply