| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Neutrality
editI have no knowledge of the local politics involved here, but the way this is currently written does not seem neutral, including its summary of his education career, and the fact that the only information about his current election campaign is noting that he is partisan and that he has had to give back money. This way all well be true, but is there a more neutral way of wording it, and is there some other basic neutral content that can be added? Melcous (talk) 07:08, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
neutrality
editA denizen of Los Angeles, I find this article restrained and fair. No is mention made about the vicious charter school fights going on in California and the pro-charter position Tuck has taken. This article may be too neutral in light of that political atmosphere. Including the charter issue, however, would be problematic and 'over-informative.' This should be left as written.20:25, 13 March 2018 (UTC)Swapoo24 (talk)
Neutrality
editEditors should be wary of characterizations of the Partnership for Los Angeles Schools that have been repeatedly attributed to a report by the Partnership for Los Angeles Schools about its own results and not a third-party source. egayovnob (talk) 03:38, 10 May 2018 (UTC)