Talk:Marlton Circle

Untitled comments

It seems that many of those editing this article are doing so with a strong bias against the project of changing the circle. The part about traffic increasing is completely unfounded right now. Perhaps it should be removed? 68.36.89.151 (talk) 20:56, 30 November 2008 (UTC)LPreston82

Deletion?

I am a bit puzzled. This article may not be the best written or the longest, but it certainly is notable enough to keep. Sure it has info on other pages, but why isn't the Collingwood Circle page up for deletion or some of the other circles that have their own pages? That page is literally 5 times shorter than this. Unless someone nominates all of the existing pages for deletion, then I stand corrected. I even added some updated info to this page, since this circle is undergoing a huge construction phase...as I happen to be in that area last weekend visiting my friend. I drove down Route 73 through Marlton to get there. I notice a huge overpass that looks almost complete. This circle has changed so much I hardly recognized it. The next time I happen to be in that area, I was going to take some pictures of the construction taking place and hopefully when it is complete. Since Dough person nominated this out of nowhere, there is a slight chance I will just happen to re-create it and start it from scratch with photos and better wording. Tinton5 (talk) 18:03, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. One article discussion at a time, any others need not be nominated or proposed for deletion at this time. As for this article, please demonstrate how it meets the General Notability Guideline.. If the article is deleted through WP:AfD, and it is recreated, it could be subject to WP:CSD under criterion G4: "Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion". User pages that duplicate articles can be sent to WP:MfD unless the user is actively working on the article. Now, the article here is not notable at least how it is written at this time. Imzadi 1979 → 04:24, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Take a look at it now. Someone has added more to it, with sources. Tinton5 (talk) 20:20, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

circle completed?

Is the Marlton interchange completed, yet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.115.79.64 (talk) 18:50, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Yes, it is and has been for several months now. Take a look at the article. The circle has been eliminated and replaced with an overpass in the summer of 2011. There might still be a few left over fixes here and there on nearby local streets, including Centre Blvd, but the project is overall complete. Tinton5 (talk) 00:15, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marlton Circle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110208040436/http://marltoncircleconstruction.com/ to http://marltoncircleconstruction.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:20, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Marlton Circle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://medford.elauwitmedia.com/2010/04/29/7073-traffic-pattern-changes-this-weekend/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100201055017/http://marlton.elauwitmedia.com/2009/11/24/first-stage-of-overpass-nearly-done/ to http://marlton.elauwitmedia.com/2009/11/24/first-stage-of-overpass-nearly-done/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120503001508/http://sj.sunne.ws/2011/06/24/breaking-news-marlton-circle-eliminated-tonight/ to http://sj.sunne.ws/2011/06/24/breaking-news-marlton-circle-eliminated-tonight/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:08, 18 January 2018 (UTC)