Talk:Marktkirche Unser Lieben Frauen/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 12:58, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• Dabsolver check: ok
• Checklinks check: ok
• Comparing with the German article, there is nearly zero information about its architecture.
• There should be neither {{cn}} tags nor unreferenced text.
• So I give you 14 days to expand this article. If you need help, please ask (I contacted the main editor; if he doesn't answer, and if you don't find more information in the public internet, then we must live with it).
• Edit I just received a message by PumpkinSky; I will close this at the request of nominator.--♫GoP♫_T^C_N 13:41, 2 January 2012 (UTC)