Talk:Market domination
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Talk page before merged
editIs here.--Kozuch (talk) 22:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
No discussion of theories about why some firms achieve market/industry dominance
editExternal links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dominance (economics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120410072435/http://kuznets.fas.harvard.edu/~athey/Invest_Mkt_Dominance.pdf to http://kuznets.fas.harvard.edu/~athey/Invest_Mkt_Dominance.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Added section 'EU Law and Dominance'
editHello,
As part of a university project I have today added information regarding EU Law and Dominance, this has resulted in me adding a new section and a new subsection. Although the content is quite legal, it is important to add that there are different perspectives of what indicates dominance, and one of these is the view of the Commission. I am open to any feedback or criticism. All sources are either legal documents or documents that are free and open to the public.