Talk:Market Forces (The Spectacular Spider-Man)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleMarket Forces (The Spectacular Spider-Man) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 11, 2009Good article nomineeListed

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Market Forces (The Spectacular Spider-Man)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: maclean (talk) 00:23, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article?)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
Notes
  • written by Andrew Robinson and directed by Dan Fausett.[1] - I don't see this in citation 1.
  • The animators reportedly had "fun" using the animation style.[1] - I think this mischaracterizes the reference. This makes it sound like the animators were laughing and clapping while doing the animation but the ref is refering to the animators being creative with the animation style.
  • Why does one ref say that Victor Cook was the director?
    • It says that for all the episodes, but its wrong. The Flash {talk} 03:40, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
      • If all this source is doing in referencing "S1E04" production number, can it be removed? I'm questioning its reliability according to WP:RS's "reputation for fact-checking and accuracy". maclean (talk) 19:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
        • Oh, it's not unreliable — it's Marvel Comics official website, there's nothing unreliable about it. It's just wrong about directors, probably because Cook is a supervising director for the entire series. The Flash {talk} 20:28, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • The quote "keeps up the bandwagon of great writing, with some nice payoffs to the past two, story progression and set up." is used twice.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Market Forces (The Spectacular Spider-Man). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:20, 3 June 2017 (UTC)Reply