Talk:Mark Warschauer
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
db-repost edit
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Warschauer. Abductive (reasoning) 10:06, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Loss of his son edit
This section is inappropriate. Clearly, this mistake is not the reason for this page on Wikipedia, rather it is for his scholarly contributions. I move that the section be removed as it does not provide a meaningful or significant contribution to a page that is focused on his academic work. The inclusion of such information does not represent the encyclopedic nature of Wikipedia--ask yourself, would Encyclopedia Britannica have included this information? No. It detracts from the pure scholarly focus the page should have. Deluxe (talk) 19:31, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Right, this is a no-brainer, I'm deleting it. I shudder to consider for what reasons someone included it. Shame on whomever did so, you obviously never have lost a child. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.78.132.142 (talk) 02:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC) (and if it was added by Mark, I'm more sorry than words can convey--may you grow to forgive yourself. David.)