Talk:Mark Sargent (flat Earth proponent)
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to pseudoscience and fringe science, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Arbitration Ruling on the Treatment of Pseudoscience In December of 2006 the Arbitration Committee ruled on guidelines for the presentation of topics as pseudoscience in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience. The final decision was as follows:
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Page creation edit
New page from my sandbox. Please do improve it if you can. There could be a little more personal details from videos, but I'm sticking to credible sources. Notability: several news report and the Behind the Curve doc really establish the important role he plays in the movement. Robincantin (talk) 19:27, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Notability edit
OK. Let's start a notability discussion. Is the guy who - according to skeptical critics as well as believers - almost single handedly sparked the modern flat Earth movement with his YouTube series (as documented in places such as the Netflix documentary on FE beliefs) not notable? RobP (talk) 22:23, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- I added several credible sources, including some that identify Sargent as a "prominent" or "leading" flat-earther who "launched" the modern movement and is its "main organizer". Added data on the size of his YouTube audience, which was absent from the article when the notability template was added by CommanderWaterford. I believe we're well above the bar now. Robincantin (talk) 01:19, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
This is why flat earth theories exists edit
So that people like Mark can have a wikipedia page and there are Netflix shows and other things about them. It is all about being someone even if they are portrayed as a fool. This whole page should be removed. Darrenaustralia (talk) 22:41, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- I agree. People like this dope and Icke are more dangerous than one might think: stupid beliefs lead to more stupid beliefs. 50.230.251.244 (talk) 12:08, 8 May 2022 (UTC)