Talk:Mark S. Komrad
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
Publications a bit much
edit@LeadSongDog: I notice you added these PubMed publications to balance out the PR firm's selection of the guy's publications, but I think it's having the negative effect of turning this into a resume for the guy. I'm guessing those are from some PubMed search or curated page, in which case I think an external link to the PubMed page would serve better in this case. I think "Selected publications" are fairly common, with the understanding that the curation was done by consensus of the editors of the page. I think the goal is to usually find some representative (e.g. most popular) publications in the area's of the subject's expertise, and if they've written books a full bibliography is not uncommon. 0x0077BE (talk · contrib) 21:28, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- In a sense it was a response to the implicit wp:OR of the "selected" publications list. Who makes the selection? We need independent authorities to do that, as the bare minimum secondary source. LeadSongDog come howl! 16:10, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- @LeadSongDog: That is not the standard that almost any biography article is held to, and adding randomly selected PubMed publications is not the solution to it, not to mention it's unnecessary, since we can just link to the Pubmed listing. See Richard_Feynman#Bibliography, Elinor_Ostrom#Selected_publications, Norman_Borlaug#Books_and_lectures, Max_Planck#Publications, none of which has a single secondary source referenced for their selected bibliographies. These are randomly selected examples. The "who" that selects them is the editors of this encyclopedia. Consider that we don't include every single fact about a person or every single reference to every single fact, either. It's not unreasonable to have a curated list of publications which highlight the person's career. 0x0077BE (talk · contrib) 23:38, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- The pubmed list wasn't random, it was complete. Perhaps that leads to excessive length, but it avoids injecting editor's POV. The "selected" lists without explicit criteria are the problem. Wikipedia:WikiProject_Bibliographies#Recommended_structure and MOS:LOW pertain.LeadSongDog come howl! 02:13, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- @LeadSongDog: That is not the standard that almost any biography article is held to, and adding randomly selected PubMed publications is not the solution to it, not to mention it's unnecessary, since we can just link to the Pubmed listing. See Richard_Feynman#Bibliography, Elinor_Ostrom#Selected_publications, Norman_Borlaug#Books_and_lectures, Max_Planck#Publications, none of which has a single secondary source referenced for their selected bibliographies. These are randomly selected examples. The "who" that selects them is the editors of this encyclopedia. Consider that we don't include every single fact about a person or every single reference to every single fact, either. It's not unreasonable to have a curated list of publications which highlight the person's career. 0x0077BE (talk · contrib) 23:38, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mark S. Komrad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141214121018/http://www.youneedhelpbook.com/You_Need_Help/Media_Interviews.html to http://www.youneedhelpbook.com/You_Need_Help/Media_Interviews.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141217174318/http://www.komradmd.com/Mark_Komrad_MD/Audio.html to http://www.komradmd.com/Mark_Komrad_MD/Audio.html
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.nami.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Inform_Yourself/Upcoming_Events/EPA/2013_Winners.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:40, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Orphan article message
edit
Please help this orphan article by adding links to it in related articles and lists. Once it has an incoming link from at least one article or list, the orphan tag can be removed (disambiguation pages, redirects and draft articles do not count). Three or more incoming links are ideal. The Find link tool may help, but not in all cases.