Talk:Mark Cole

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Controversy section

edit

It may seem unbalanced to have a controversy section which is the largest thing in the whole article, and I agree to a certain extent. But a comment such as the one about microchips; which drew national attention such of this must be included in the article. If anybody wants to include more information about Mr.Cole, then feel free to do so; but outright deleting the controversy section for the sake of balance is unconstructive. -BLM Platinum (talk) 21:50, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Meme about House Bill 663 removed. While there is controversy in the bill, the language in the bill does not imply forced genital checks at school bathrooms. A better account would be needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qphilo (talkcontribs) 02:07, 14 January 2016 (UTC) In reference to HB 663, the non-partisan PolitiFact rated claims that it required genital checks as FALSE. http://www.politifact.com/virginia/statements/2016/jan/18/occupy-democrats/occupy-democrats-grossly-twists-virginia-school-ba/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.234.44.158 (talk) 15:52, 22 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mark Cole (politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:54, 3 June 2017 (UTC)Reply