Talk:Mark Callahan

Callahan's residence

Callahan has lived in both Salem and Eugene in the past, but currently, to my knowledge, lives in the Portland area. As can be seen here, Callahan would have had to have lived in the area since 2015 at least, otherwise he could not have run for the MHCC Board of Directors. It may have been a social media post I had read in the past few months in which he stated he was in the Portlnd area; I will have to search when I have time. However, this Oregon Live article from earlier this year refers to him living in Salem. It's entirely possible that he's moving around.

I just double-checked; the zone that Callahan ran to represent on the MHCC board in 2015 includes Portland, Parkrose, and other nearby areas. ALPolitico (talk) 02:22, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

According to a Facebook comment from October 1st of this year Callahan made on his campaign page, he currently lives in the Portland area; the comment is on a post from September 30, which has a link to a radio ad. ALPolitico (talk) 04:52, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

An IP claiming to be Callahan changed his residence to Portland from Salem a couple weeks back. MB298 (talk) 05:02, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, he tends to do that. If you want a laugh, go and look at the history of the United States Senate election in Oregon, 2016 page. He's the reason it's semi-protected until April 2017. ALPolitico (talk) 05:30, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Eugene mayoral bid

According to the Oregon Secretary of State's website, at one point around 2011, Callahan had formed a committee to run for Mayor of Eugene. He ran for the legislature (and President) instead, as can clearly be seen in the article, but I haven't found anything else on the abandoned mayoral bid. If anyone finds a news article or anything, though, it may be worth adding. ALPolitico (talk) 04:03, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mark Callahan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161022092803/http://www.lanecounty.org/Departments/CAO/Operations/CountyClerk/elections/Pages/20100518_results.aspx to http://www.lanecounty.org/Departments/CAO/Operations/CountyClerk/elections/Pages/20100518_results.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161022094218/http://www.lanecounty.org/Departments/CAO/Operations/CountyClerk/elections/Pages/20110517_Results3.aspx to http://www.lanecounty.org/Departments/CAO/Operations/CountyClerk/elections/Pages/20110517_Results3.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:08, 18 January 2018 (UTC)