Talk:Mario Baeza

Copyright concerns

This article may have been substantially copied from Baeza's official biography. However, please see the comment about "The Latino Educational Crisis: Towards a New Approach to Preparing Latino Children for Success in School and in Life ("About the Author")" above. We can't be sure of this without an older version of an official bio to compare. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:33, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

I have now modified and shortened many of the sections to reduce the promotionalism, and a side effect of that may have been to decrease the copyvio. DGG ( talk ) 17:34, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mario Baeza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080517020947/http://www.nyc.gov/lmec to http://www.nyc.gov/lmec

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:40, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

COI editing by subject of article - revert to earlier version?

It appears the subject of this article has just added a huge amount of uncited and poorly-formatted content about themselves. I started to try to clean it up, but it reads so much like a CV that I don't think the effort to sort out this mess is justifiable. Here are just examples of the problem: 1) There are no proper references, just lots of incline External links to organisational homepages, and 2) I've already had to delete 49 uses of the honorific 'Mr.' added by the subject himself (or the user editing under that name, at least). The user knows so little of our editing requirements and Manual of Style, that I feel these edits are not helpful.

I propose that we revert the article to its 13 May 2020 version (see here), and then allow it to be built up again gradually, with proper inline citation. Anything that is not supported with a citation should be removed.

The subject of the article can make individual recommendations for edits (with citations) using the {{edit request}} template on the Talk page, rather than adding it themselves.

Any support, dissent, or alternative suggestions? Pinging @DGG: who previously cleaned up this article back in 2017, and Mbaeza123 who made all these recent edits. Nick Moyes (talk) 19:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

• Support reversion to 13 May 2020. The lack of citations is a really big issue right now (the entire article only has one reference). —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 19:32, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
• Support. Per Tenryuu and Nick Moyes. - SUBWAY 21:41, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
• Support, and then redirect the articleon his bok,, and then consider protecting the redirect. DGG ( talk ) 17:01, 28 May 2020 (UTC)