Talk:Maria Konopnicka

Polish atheist?

Giving false information about this person is unacceptaple. There is not enough, that on her grave is cross? There is also text from her poem: "...Proście wy Boga o takie mogiły, Które łez nie chcą, ni skarg, ni żałości, Lecz dają sercom moc czynu, zdrój siły Na dzień przyszłości...". Andrzej19 (talk) 18:48, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

I removed it, as I agree a reference is needed (and I couldn't find one). Ditto for the torbanist (musician) category. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:46, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

B Class

I didn't see any other issues of UNDUE, Non-NPOV, or ORIGINAL. EBY (talk) 01:03, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maria Konopnicka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080507211932/http://www.muzeum.suwalki.info/strona_m.php?dz=1&id=99 to http://www.muzeum.suwalki.info/strona_m.php?dz=1&id=99

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:16, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maria Konopnicka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130413151003/http://m.onet.pl/wiadomosci/kraj,2chpc to http://m.onet.pl/wiadomosci/kraj,2chpc

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:20, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Konopnicka's supposed bisexuality

Is is just me or in this sentence: "It has been speculated that she was bisexual or a lesbian (particularly in relation to Dulębianka), though this has not been properly researched, and the question is not usually mentioned in biographies of Konopnicka" words "this has not been properly researched and the question is not usually mentioned in biographies" are an euphemism for: it's a pure speculation and there is no evidence or any factual support for it whatsoever. Therefore probably this is how it should be presented in the arcicle - as a speculation and nothing more. Monsieur empereur (talk) 08:40, 24 May 2022 (UTC)