Talk:Margarethe Selenka

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anthropology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Feminism Low‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indonesia Low‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

This article does not prove notability. The only citation give is to a journal that does not qualify as reliable under WP:RS. OlYeller^Talktome 18:01, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I did some searches to try and prove notability. Here's what I have so far. Google Scholar: Lenore Margarethe Selenka-Heinemann (0), Margarethe Selenka (54). Google News (Archives): Margarethe Selenka (4).

In those searches, there are ~58 possible references. I'd say about 75% of the archive searches are to the Journal of Women's History and another 15% are in German. I've started a list below of English references to add to the list. There's certainly enough to prove notability but we just need to get the refs into the article so that we can verify the information in the article. I'll tag the article up and then come back to references. Not that I have anything against German but it's hard to use a source as a reference if you don't know what it's saying. OlYeller^Talktome 13:25, 3 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2003.10.071

Patriotic pacifism By Sandi E. Cooper

Article Name Change edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Everything I find about "Lenore Margarethe Selenka-Heinemann" references her as "Margarethe Lenore Selenka" instead. Unless others object, I'll be moving it to "Margarethe Lenore Selenka" and leaving a redirect to that page from here and from "Lenore Margarethe Selenka-Heinemann." OlYeller^Talktome 13:11, 3 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Accuracy edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The followind sentences imply that Homo erectus (Java man being one) isn't considered today by anthropologists a direct ancestor for humans:

"Creationists see this as proof that modern humans lived at the same time as Java men, thus excluding the possibility that Java man can be a direct ancestor for humans. This is based on a misunderstanding since Homo erectus is today by anthropologists seen as human itself.[citation needed]"

But Wiki page on Homo erectus states otherwise:

"no consensus has been reached as to whether it is ancestral to H. sapiens or any later hominids." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Twist73 (talk • contribs) 15:02, 16 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic