.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
 | A fact from Marcelo Odebrecht appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 July 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Definition of criminal because you are too lazy to use a dictionary edit
criminal noun
Definition of criminal (Entry 2 of 2) 1 : one who has committed a crime 2 : a person who has been convicted of a crime
Don't need consensus on OBJECTIVE FUCKING FACTS.
Criminal is unsourced? That is an overt lie edit
The article ALREADY HAD HIS CRIMINAL CHARGES LISTED IN HIS BIO. He is a criminal. You are whitewashing this to pretend he is not and using the worst and flimsiest possible arguments to do so. Stop using wikipedia to push your stupid agenda, this is objective facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.60.186.231 (talk) 04:17, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Businessman implies you are not doing illegal things, we don't call Pablo Escobar a businessman do we? You are either lying or are not equip to judge due to lack of intelligence https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pablo_Escobar Notice how he is not called a businessman? Now follow the logic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.60.186.231 (talk) 04:40, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Writer (clearly the subject) thinks convicted criminal translates to entrepreneur edit
It in fact does not
Consensus edit
I strongly recommend gaining a consensus here on the talk page before changing this individual's occupation to "criminal". —Eyer (If you reply, add {{reply to|Eyer}} to your message to let me know.) 02:32, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
"criminal noun Definition of criminal (Entry 2 of 2) 1 : one who has committed a crime 2 : a person who has been convicted of a crime" A dictionary, learn to use one yourself. Or stop editing, because you are woefully ill equip to do this task.
Don't need consensus on OBJECTIVE FUCKING FACTS.
Unfortunately,167.60.186.231 (talk)) there is a problem with that argument, the state of being a criminal is not an occupation. A businessman merely implies that he was a businessman. Not that he hasn't done evil because he has done some. For example, Charles Ponzi is a criminal but he is not called that under occupation. He is called a financier, albeit a certainly criminal one at that. So please, understand that such issues like these cannot be simply solved with a dictionary. In addition, understand that we are not understating the fact that Marcello Odebrecht is a criminal because he is. However, businessman is his official profession. Dictonary1 (talk) 03:53, 23 July 2019 (UTC)